Oracle Collection Instead of Dual

I’m still retrofitting a bunch of SQL queries to use bind_by_name and came across a strange scenario. I created a recursive query (STARTS WITH / CONNECT BY PRIOR) but I needed to grab the original value too. The quickest way to accomplish this was to union in something like “select 12345CDE as equipment_id from dual”. But the only way to get a bunch of these original values grafted onto the result set is to iterate through the array once to build my :placeholder1, :placeholder2, …, placeholderN placeholders and then iterate through the array again to bind each placeholder to its proper value.

I’ve been working with Oracle collections for LIKE and IN queries, and thought I could use a table that only exists within the query to glom the entire array into a single placeholder. It works! A query like

select column_value equipment_id from TABLE(sys.ODCIVARCHAR2LIST('12345CDE', '23456BCD', '34567ABC') );

Adds each of the values to my result set.

Which means I can use a query like “select column_value as equipment_id from TABLE(:myIDs)” and bind the collection to :myIDs.

Alexa Dungeon Adventure – Lightsaber?

We managed to get a lightsaber in the Dungeon Adventure game. Scott said something like “try to smash the chest with the morningstar”, and a screen came up with the ‘do or do not, there is no try’ and said we had a new weapon. Checked the weapon list and, hey, there’s a super powerful weapon. Damage is 7d6 — so better than the super sword we were hoping to find somewhere in the dungeon.

SNL

I hate that Musk (and many other people) conflate a real condition with permission to be a jerk. You learned something about how your brain or biochemistry work and can use this information to relate better with others? Great! You learned something about how your brain or biochemistry work and take that as permission to mistreat people, defame them, etc? No good. I get PMS. It doesn’t mean I get to scream at people and verbally abuse them for a week every month.

If he had someone reading his tweets before publishing — to ensure he wasn’t, say, about to call a stranger a pedo — I’d be more accepting of the “I have Aspbergers” announcement because the announcement would have continued with “… and I understand that things I don’t consider offensive really bother people, so I’ve taken this concrete step to avoid inflicting harm on others in the future”. Similarly, considering yourself a visionary because you don’t care enough about others to think that their near certain death isn’t a big obstacle to colonizing Mars? I think that’s callousness.

Docker – List Container Startup Policies

A quick one-line Bash command to output all containers and the startup policy:

docker container ls -aq | xargs docker container inspect --format '{{ .Name }}: {{.HostConfig.RestartPolicy.Name}}'

For Docker on Windows, the following PowerShell command produces similar results:

$jsonData = docker container ls -aq |%{docker container inspect --format "{{json .}}"$_}
[System.Collections.ArrayList]$arrayContainerConfig = @()
foreach($jsonContainerConfig in $jsonData ){
	$psobjContainerConfig = ConvertFrom-JSON $jsonContainerConfig
	$arrayContainerConfig.add(@{Name=$psobjContainerConfig.Name;Hostname=$psobjContainerConfig.Config.Hostname;CurrentlyRunning=$psobjContainerConfig.State.Running;RestartPolicy=$psobjContainerConfig.HostConfig.RestartPolicy.Name})
}

$arrayContainerConfig | ForEach {[PSCustomObject]$_} | Format-Table -AutoSize

Oracle – Collections and IN or LIKE Queries

I’ve been retrofitting a lot of PHP/SQL queries to use oci_bind_by_name recently. When using “IN” clauses, you can iterate through your array twice, but it’s an inefficient approach.

// Build the query string with a bunch of placeholders
$strQuery = "select Col1, Col2, Col3 from TableName where ColName IN (";
for($i=0; $i < count($array); $i++){
    if($i > 0){
        $strQuery = $strQuery . ", ";
    }
    $strQuery = $strQuery . ":bindvar" . $i;
}
$strQuery = $strQuery . ")";
... 
// Then bind each placeholder to something
for($i=0; $i < count($array); $i++){
    oci_bind_by_name($stmt, ":bindvar".$i, $array[$i]);
}

Building a table from the array data and using an Oracle collection object creates cleaner code and avoids a second iteration of the array:

$strQuery = "SELECT indexID, objName FROM table WHERE objName in (SELECT column_value FROM table(:myIds))";
$stmt = oci_parse($conn, $strQuery);

$coll = oci_new_collection($kpiprd_conn, 'ODCIVARCHAR2LIST','SYS');
foreach ($arrayValues as $strValue) {
     $coll->append($strValue);
}
oci_bind_by_name($stmt, ':myIds', $coll, -1, OCI_B_NTY);
oci_set_prefetch($stmt, 300);
oci_execute($stmt);

A simple like clause is quite straight-forward

$strNameLikeString = "SomeName%";
$strQuery = "SELECT ds_dvrsty_set_nm from ds_dvrsty_set WHERE ds_dvrsty_set_nm LIKE :divsetnm ORDER BY ds_dvrsty_set_nm DESC fetch first 1 row only";

$stmt = oci_parse($connDB, $strQuery);
oci_bind_by_name($stmt, ":divsetnm", $strNameLikeString);
oci_set_prefetch($stmt, 300);
oci_execute($stmt);

But what about an array of inputs essentially reproducing the LIKE ANY predicate in PostgreSQL? There’s not a direct equivalent in Oracle, and iterating through the array twice to build out a query WHERE (Field1 LIKE ‘Thing1%’ OR Field1 LIKE ‘Thing2%’ OR Field1 LIKE ‘Thing3%’) is undesirable. The with EXISTS allows me to create a LIKE ANY type query and only iterate through my array once to bind variables to placeholders using the same collection approach as was used with the IN clause.

$arrayLocs = array('ERIEPAXE%', 'HNCKOHXA%', 'LTRKARXK%');
$strQuery = "SELECT location_id, clli_code FROM network_location WHERE EXISTS (select 1 FROM TABLE(:likelocs) WHERE clli_code LIKE column_value)";
$stmt = oci_parse($connDB, $strQuery);

$coll = oci_new_collection($connDB, 'ODCIVARCHAR2LIST','SYS');
foreach ($arrayLocs as $strLocation) {
    $coll->append($strLocation);
}
oci_bind_by_name($stmt, ':likelocs', $coll, -1, OCI_B_NTY);
oci_execute($stmt);
print "<table>\n";
print "<tr><th>Loc ID</th><th>CLLI</th></tr>\n";
while ($row = oci_fetch_array($stmt, OCI_ASSOC+OCI_RETURN_NULLS)) {
    print "<tr><td>" . $row['LOCATION_ID'] . "</td><td>" . $row['CLLI_CODE'] . "</td></tr>\n";
}
print "</table>\n";

There are many different collection types in Oracle which can be used with oci_new_collection. A full list of the system collection types can be queried from the database.

SELECT * FROM SYS.ALL_TYPES WHERE TYPECODE = 'COLLECTION' and OWNER = 'SYS';

Frog Rescue

Anya rescued a frog today. It had rained overnight, and the frog somehow hopped on top of our chicken tractor. It got stuck in the screen that covers the top of the tractor. Anya managed to pick up the frog, and she carried it back to our pond. It hopped out of her hands when they were close to the pond.

Socialized Medicine

What really gets me is that the US has socialized health care. Your insurance company isn’t logging all of the excess income they make from you to a large medical expense you incur in the future. The whole point of insurance is that the million (or whatever) ‘customers’ all pay in their their, say, thirteen grand a year. Many people get their annual checkup, and that’s it. Insurance company pays out a couple hundred bucks from that thirteen grand. Someone gets heart surgery – the excess all those only-checkup people paid covers it, and the insurance company pays out fifty grand for that stranger’s medical care.

The American insurance system is just socialized in small, less efficient islands. Those islands are making money off of us all. And you get voted off the island when you lose your job.

Oh, and people still go bankrupt from medical expenses. Or resort to airing their sad story on GoFundMe hoping for donations. I guess we all get to feel benevolent when we donate to their fundraiser, and just paying taxes doesn’t get to make you feel like you’re personally helping someone. But do we really need a profit-driven and inefficient solution just so we can feel good about ourselves? Maybe we could switch to a more efficient system where everyone is the customer pool and the insurance company is looking to more or less break even. And you can donate the money you save on heath care to some other charity — homeless people, bail projects, food kitchens, abused animals, etc.

PostgreSQL Sequences

I’m having a problem with a database refusing to change INSERTS to UPDATES on the ON CONFLICT condition — it insists that a ‘duplicate key value violates unique constraint’. A little time with a search engine tells me that sequences can get out of sync, and then you cannot insert items into the table. How do you know your sequence is out of sync?

SELECT NEXTVAL((SELECT PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE('"table_name"', 'name_of_column_with_sequence'))) as "NextValue", MAX("name_of_column_with_sequence") AS "Max Value" FROM "table_name";

So null seems like it would be a problem!

For future reference, when the next value is smaller than the max value in the table, the solution is to set the series value based on the max value

SELECT SETVAL((SELECT PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE('"table_name"', 'name_of_column_with_sequence')), (SELECT (MAX("name_of_column_with_sequence") + 1) FROM "table_name"), FALSE);