{"id":6066,"date":"2020-03-07T22:59:14","date_gmt":"2020-03-08T03:59:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/?p=6066"},"modified":"2020-03-07T13:14:30","modified_gmt":"2020-03-07T18:14:30","slug":"more-on-conspiracy-theories-and-the-democratic-primary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/?p=6066","title":{"rendered":"More on conspiracy theories and the Democratic Primary"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Statistical analysis can make you suspicious &#8212; &#8216;black swan&#8217; statistical outliers (which are still <em>possible<\/em> outcomes) and amazing coincidences where outlier possibilities are reality. Maybe it&#8217;s more fun to think about the conspiracy theory possibilities &#8212; there&#8217;s drama and intrigue. Whereas an unlikely occurrence happening because unlikely doesn&#8217;t mean impossible &#8230; that&#8217;s far less entertaining.<\/p>\n<p>The Super Tuesday results are still not complete today. Where are results still pending? There are 115 delegates not yet allocated to a candidate. 13 of these are classed as &#8220;Democrats Abroad&#8221; &#8212; saying that the results for &#8220;Democrats Abroad&#8221; is outstanding because ballots are still in the post is reasonable. I&#8217;d expect a large portion of &#8220;Democrats Abroad&#8221; ballots to\u00a0 be posted (although there are evidently like 400 in-person polling sites too). And I don&#8217;t know how &#8220;Abroad&#8221; they&#8217;re talking about &#8212; Canada? Germany? Australia? McMurdo Station? The ISS? I&#8217;m willing to remove these delegates from the Super Tuesday list (IIRC, their in-person voting spanned a week coming up to Super Tuesday too). Of the remaining 102 delegates, <em>one<\/em> is from a state where Biden is in the lead. Not quite 1% of the outstanding delegates are in a state where Biden is in the lead. Is it <em>possible<\/em> that this outlier is an amazing coincidence? Sure. But could the DNC be creating a narrative where Biden has a decent lead in the electoral count ahead of voting this coming Tuesday with the intent of influencing voters (some 60% of whom say electability is more important than the fact the candidate agrees with them about issues)? Hard not to go there.<\/p>\n<table width=\"846\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\"><strong>State<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"121\"><strong>Winner<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"69\"><strong>Delegates<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"150\"><strong>Unallocated Delegates<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"97\"><strong>% Unallocated<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"43\"><strong>Biden<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"75\"><strong>Bloomberg<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"60\"><strong>Gabbard<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"56\"><strong>Sanders<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"54\"><strong>Warren<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Alabama<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Biden<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">52<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">44<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">8<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Arkansas<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Biden<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">31<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">17<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">5<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">9<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Maine<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Biden<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">24<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">11<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">9<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Massachusetts<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Biden<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">91<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">37<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">29<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">25<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Minnesota<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Biden<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">75<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">38<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">27<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">North Carolina<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Biden<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">110<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">67<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">37<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Oklahoma<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Biden<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">37<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">21<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">2<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">13<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Tennessee<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Biden<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">64<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">1<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">2%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">33<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">10<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">19<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Texas<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Biden<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">228<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">111<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">10<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">102<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Virginia<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Biden<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">99<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">66<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">31<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">American Samoa<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Bloomberg<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">6<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">2<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">California<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Sanders<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">415<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">61<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">15%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">148<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">15<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">186<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Colorado<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Sanders<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">67<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">27<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">40%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">10<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">9<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">20<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Utah<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Sanders<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">29<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">13<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">45%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">2<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">2<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">12<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">Vermont<\/td>\n<td width=\"121\">Sanders<\/td>\n<td width=\"69\">16<\/td>\n<td width=\"150\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"97\">0%<\/td>\n<td width=\"43\">5<\/td>\n<td width=\"75\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"60\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"56\">11<\/td>\n<td width=\"54\">0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Statistical analysis can make you suspicious &#8212; &#8216;black swan&#8217; statistical outliers (which are still possible outcomes) and amazing coincidences where outlier possibilities are reality. Maybe it&#8217;s more fun to think about the conspiracy theory possibilities &#8212; there&#8217;s drama and intrigue. Whereas an unlikely occurrence happening because unlikely doesn&#8217;t mean impossible &#8230; that&#8217;s far less entertaining. &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[924,923],"class_list":["post-6066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","tag-2020-democratic-primary","tag-democratic-primary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6066"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6066\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6069,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6066\/revisions\/6069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}