{"id":3372,"date":"2018-11-02T10:44:41","date_gmt":"2018-11-02T15:44:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lisa.rushworth.us\/?p=3372"},"modified":"2020-11-02T10:55:33","modified_gmt":"2020-11-02T15:55:33","slug":"cloudy-roi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/?p=3372","title":{"rendered":"Cloudy ROI"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I often have trouble seeing the value behind cloud offerings &#8212; but most cloud migrations I&#8217;ve seen have done 1:1 replacement of locally hosted servers with cloud hosted servers. The first two years, the cloud hosted servers are cheaper (although that&#8217;s some dodgy accounting as we&#8217;re assuming no workforce changes as a result of outsourcing servers and depreciation of the owned asset is not considered). The third year, though, is a break-even point. General Depreciation System considers computers a five-year property, but there are accounting practices to handle fully depreciated assets. It remains on the balance sheet as a cost, it&#8217;s accumulated depreciation is listed as a accumulated depreciation contra asset item. When you *do* stop using the asset, the accumulated depreciation account is debited for the full depreciated amount, the fixed asset account is credited with its full cost. Point being I <em>can<\/em> continue using a computer asset after five years. Cloud hosted servers make financial sense for a company that tends towards &#8220;bleeding edge&#8221; implementations (buying the new whatever next year), but for a company that buys a server or application and then uses it for a decade &#8230; you&#8217;re simply turning capital expense into a greater ongoing operating expense. Which &#8230; good this year, but bad in the long term.<\/p>\n<p>Now for a smaller company that <em>doesn&#8217;t <\/em>have a dedicated IT department, and that doesn&#8217;t actually need the capacity provided by a single modern server &#8230; externally hosting resources is financially beneficial. A web site, e-mail, chat-based customer service? All make sense to host externally. You don&#8217;t have to own half a dozen servers, make sure they&#8217;re backed up, etc. But I don&#8217;t see the cost benefit at enterprise levels unless (1) you want to build data centers close to customers without the expense of actually building a data center. For instance, opening your services to customers in the EU &#8230; getting a data center set up in, say, Germany isn&#8217;t a quick proposition. As your business grows, it may become &#8220;worth it&#8221; to invest money into a European data center. But cloud-hosted computers from some major provider who already has a presence there provides quick time-to-market and minimizes up-front cost. Some countries may have a laborious process for prospective businesses too &#8212; a process the cloud hosting provider has already navigated. Or you (2) plan a substantial workforce reduction. If someone else is backing up, patching, and monitoring systems &#8230; you don&#8217;t need people performing those duties. Since a cloud-hosting provider is able to leverage those employees across far more servers than you&#8217;d need &#8212; there&#8217;s a place where scale produces a cost benefit. But, strangely, I don&#8217;t see companies reducing IT operations staff after moving to the cloud. This may be a long-term goal to ensure the enthusiasm of staff for the move &#8212; it&#8217;s not particularly enticing to put six months of work into a project that ensures my job goes away. Or this may just be a thing &#8212; move to the cloud and still have twenty ops employees.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I often have trouble seeing the value behind cloud offerings &#8212; but most cloud migrations I&#8217;ve seen have done 1:1 replacement of locally hosted servers with cloud hosted servers. The first two years, the cloud hosted servers are cheaper (although that&#8217;s some dodgy accounting as we&#8217;re assuming no workforce changes as a result of outsourcing &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[623,399,30],"tags":[1167,479],"class_list":["post-3372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-containerized-development-and-deployment","category-expense-reduction","category-system-administration","tag-cloud","tag-cloud-computing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3372"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3372\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7137,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3372\/revisions\/7137"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}