{"id":1023,"date":"2017-03-28T16:26:16","date_gmt":"2017-03-28T21:26:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lisa.rushworth.us\/?p=1023"},"modified":"2017-03-28T21:02:42","modified_gmt":"2017-03-29T02:02:42","slug":"government-as-a-business","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/?p=1023","title":{"rendered":"Government as a Business"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;re getting another attempt to remodel the government as a business. If I\u00a0<em>had<\/em> to run the federal government like a business, I sure as hell wouldn&#8217;t want to run it like one of Trump&#8217;s businesses! But lets ignore\u00a0<em>whose<\/em> business.<\/p>\n<p>The problem with the swat team Trump&#8217;s announced is that it seems to presuppose that the problem with government is a top-level management issue that could be sorted by sound business practices. What corporation has their top level leadership appointed by its customers? Or even its owners &#8211; sure, corporate boards are voted by shareholders &#8230; but not the C-level positions. Additionally, what business would almost guarantee multi-year positions to their high level leadership team? Regardless of performance?!<\/p>\n<p>There is something to be said for bringing private sector innovation into government operations &#8212; especially at a lower level. Match up individual functions of government agencies with\u00a0private sector businesses or even non-profits that have similar functionalities. Several government agencies have large logistical operations (FEMA, military)\u00a0that a logistics company could help.\u00a0Maybe Habitat for Humanity has ideas that would farther HUD&#8217;s goals. University teams\u00a0may have interesting input\u00a0too. And marketing &#8212; corporate experience would certainly be beneficial in\u00a0<em>selling<\/em> legislation and initiatives.<\/p>\n<p>But the fundamental problem I have with the principal that government\u00a0<em>should<\/em> run like a business is that few businesses are monopolies.\u00a0If you don&#8217;t like how a business operates, what values they support, the product they create &#8230; you shop around and select another one.<\/p>\n<p>There was a whole thing a year or two ago with a baker who didn&#8217;t want to make a cake for a homosexual couple&#8217;s wedding.\u00a0But as a customer, I can chose not to contract with a bigoted pastry chef for\u00a0<em>my<\/em> events either. It is possible enough people don&#8217;t care and she remains in business. Or her choices mean her business goes under. Either way, you are not forced to support her beliefs because there are other bakeries.<\/p>\n<p>Government provides services that cannot be privatized &#8211; for reasons of efficiency, non-profitability, or sensibility (privatizing the\u00a0military security and prisons are a good counter-example of why government\u00a0<em>should<\/em> provide these services). As such, I cannot just pick another military\u00a0if I think the federal one is engaged in too many offensive operations. I cannot select a new environmental protection agency if I think the federal one fails to actually protect the environment.<\/p>\n<p>If we&#8217;re going to operate the government like a monopoly (see: industries generally subject to a LOT of regulation), we are not just the customers! The government is a customer owned co-op. One that\u00a0operates in hundreds of different verticals.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;re getting another attempt to remodel the government as a business. If I\u00a0had to run the federal government like a business, I sure as hell wouldn&#8217;t want to run it like one of Trump&#8217;s businesses! But lets ignore\u00a0whose business. The problem with the swat team Trump&#8217;s announced is that it seems to presuppose that the &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[150,26,24],"class_list":["post-1023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-us-government","tag-political-theory","tag-politics","tag-random"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1023"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1029,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023\/revisions\/1029"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rushworth.us\/lisa\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}